🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of states are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban is "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors unless guardian approval is given. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a good first step," commented the parliamentarian driving the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a future ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by robust evidence".

Last year, momentum built behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the topic.

Charities have expressed warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for children," stated a influential peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, action is primarily happening at the state level due to national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra use dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating parental consent for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from certain figures to copy Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond the West, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The organization points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

While this global discussion evolves, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries show that policymakers internationally are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.